All I Could See From Where I Stood

I have come to the conclusion that there are two main philosophies of “self-publishing”.

All broad characterizations are perforce oversimplifications, and this one will be more so than most, so be advised that many–probably most–of self-published authors won’t fit exactly into either category.

However.

Granting the inexactitude of what I am about to say, I believe that there are two basically incompatible ways to define the relationship between self-published authors and traditional publishing.

The first group defines “self-publishing” as “an author acting as her or his own publisher”.  That is to say that authors are emulating the model of traditional publishers.  These authors tend, to be honest, among the most successful financially. They tend to write in clearly defined genres, with traditionally designed covers, and often judge their work against the standard produced by traditional publishers.

Self-publishing, for these authors, is generally a choice made on the basis of time invested vs. profits.  Most of these authors could work for traditional publishers, but they choose to act as their own publishers instead.  In fact, most “hybrid” authors fall into this category–they learned how traditional publishers operate and decided that they could do the same thing and keep a larger share of the profits.

The other group defines “self-publishing” as “publishing outside the traditional model.”  We tend, alas, to be less successful financially. Our books, by and large, are ones that traditional publishers would not accept.  We break genres, confound reader expectations, and generally just don’t follow the rules.  For us, self-publishing is a way to get our work to readers directly, outside of the hierarchical producer/consumer relationship.

I don’t mean to be judgmental here, and I apologize if it comes across that way.  I’m not talking about “selling out” vs. “being true to your art” or anything like that.  It’s a matter of different philosophies, different ways of looking at the connection between artist and audience. The fact that they are incompatible is not mean to imply that they are not equally valid.

It does mean, though, that the overwhelming majority of well-meant advice to self-published authors simply doesn’t apply to me. The first group tend to be very generous with their time and willing to share their expertise (as successful entrepreneurs often are.) It is advice on how to set up my own miniature version of Harper-Collins-Random-Penguin-Whatever, and while I am sure it is good advice, that’s not what I am doing here.

The fact is that if I were to set up my own publishing company, I wouldn’t publish Catskinner’s Book. My work isn’t commercially viable.  I wish it were, but I have to deal with the real.  My fan base is very loyal, but it’s small and is likely to remain small.

Business strategies that are predicated on the assumption that there is a certain percentage of the populace who are natural consumers of a particular product and simply need to be informed that the product exists would bankrupt me in short order. I am not writing for the “Romance Market” or the “Sci-Fi Market” or any pre-existing market.

Instead I am writing for an entirely new market, and consequently there is no way to calculate a risk vs return analysis for marketing dollars spent.  Any marketing I do must be with entirely disposable funds, and I have little to spare.

All of the above is my own way of dealing with my frustration at reading the innumerable articles describing in detail what I should be doing and how I can become just like the latest self-publishing success story.  I tried that, and traditional methods work for traditional books.  I don’t write traditional books.

Advertisements

About MishaBurnett

I am the author of "Catskinner's Book", a science fiction novel available on Amazon Kindle. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008MPNBNS
This entry was posted in Artists That I Admire, On Promotion, On Publishing, On Writing and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to All I Could See From Where I Stood

  1. ioniamartin says:

    Reblogged this on readful things blog and commented:
    A well thought post

  2. kingmidget says:

    I think there’s a larger potential market for your books than you think. By the way, I started reading Fauxpocalypse last night. I’m enjoying it. If you haven’t already, and you find a way to start reading again, you should try Everything Matters by Ron Currie, Jr.

    • MishaBurnett says:

      Oh, I do think there is a market for my books, but the traditional discover method doesn’t seem to be working for it.

      I’m glad you like Fauxpocalypse. There are some very good stories in there.

  3. This is very well put. 🙂 Your approach should reflect your unique book, your unique objectives, your unique target audience, and even your unique strengths and weaknesses. Even many authors from the first category find things in the one-size-fits-all advice that don’t seem to apply to them. However, I suspect that there may be a larger audience for your books than you realize, and hope that you are pleasantly surprised sometime in the future. 🙂

  4. Reblogged this on chrismcmullen and commented:
    Here is a valuable perspective on marketing. It’s worth keeping this in mind when sorting out all the marketing advice out there (including the ideas you read on my own blog).

  5. I have to agree, too – part of the reason we write is because we either can’t find what we want to read, or think we can do it much better. Which often means that we don’t fit into a nice boxed genre that is already there, and full of interesting books.

    I think I’m trying to create a Venn diagram with circles for all the people who might like a PART of Pride’s Children – and see if there are any in the overlap area who might like a lot of it.

    If not, I’ll have to think how to market to the people who like only a part, so that they see that part more visibly, while doing the opposite for other potential readers. It’s going to be interesting.

  6. Pingback: My Top 13 Posts Of 2013 | mishaburnett

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s