Family Badge Of Sapphire And Cracked Emerald

I was watching one of Bryan Singer’s X-Men films and I was thinking of the overarching conceit of the franchise (using “conceit” in the poetic sense of extended analogy, I am not implying that Mr. Singer has an inflated opinion of himself.)

The mythos of the film franchise (I am not familiar enough with the comic book series to comment on it) is that a random selection of individuals are born with bizarre and fantastic powers.  Despite the odd reference to genetics, I consider the series to be fantasy–no attempt is made to give any scientific explanation for how a human being could generate laser beams or magnetic fields.

While the films are visually interesting, there is a certain predictability to the franchise. Basically, they all follow a pattern:

  1. Mutants are subjected to an unprovoked attack from humans
  2. Mutants argue among themselves about how best to attack back
  3. The mutants win.

I am given to believe that the conflict between Charles and Eric is somewhat more pronounced in the source material, but in the films it comes down to a disagreement over technique–since Charles has mind control powers, he wants to control the humans’ minds and since Eric has metallic telekinesis, he wants to crush things and blow stuff up.

In my opinion the mythology morally hamstrings the characters.  All of the significant choices have been made for the characters before they were born–one is born either mutant or human.  It’s a kind of atheistic Calvinism and everyone is predestined to play a particular role.  Ones only self-determination is to decide how flamboyantly to play it.

I find Calvinism depressing in real life and limiting in fiction, so I have deliberately worked out an Arminian cosmology. One of the central premises of The Book Of Lost Doors series is that what we become is determined by the choices we make. (And while I feel that both Mr. Singer and I use our central conceits as a metaphor for the same subject, I’d rather not discuss that subject in a non-metaphorical sense at this time.)

My semi-human characters are what they are as a result of their own choices. They chose to become something other than human.  Not all at once, and not with full understanding of what they were becoming, but in the end they are responsible for what they are.  I believe that this allows a deeper range of moral development of the characters.  They aren’t (as the X-Men so often seem to be) victims of their natures, rather they are active participants in what they have become.

One of my favorite novel quotes is from Thomas Harris’ The Silence Of The Lambs.  Hannibal Lector says, “Nothing happened to me. I happened.”  That’s my philosophy in a nutshell.

There are two notable exceptions to this, of course.  Catskinner and Agony are both entirely non-human, and can never be human. They never chose to be what they are, and they can’t choose to be anything else.  They lack the capacity for self-invention; they simply are what they are. (James, on the other hand, can and does make moral choices.  He can’t do anything about being bound to Catskinner, but he can and does choose how he relates to Catskinner and the extent to which allows what was done to him to proscribe his life.)

I think that this issue is an important one in speculative fiction.  Because we deal with issues of identity in a broader (if not always deeper) way than mainstream fiction, we have to ask ourselves to what extent our characters are responsible for their own self-determination.  Is everyone in the story destined to be what they are, chosen for a particular role by some outside force?  Or is each the master of his or her own fate, the captain of her or his own soul?

Advertisements

About MishaBurnett

I am the author of "Catskinner's Book", a science fiction novel available on Amazon Kindle. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008MPNBNS
This entry was posted in On Writing, Who I am and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Family Badge Of Sapphire And Cracked Emerald

  1. LindaGHill says:

    Very interesting, and definitely food for thought. My characters were born what they are and yet to an extent they have control over what they do… until what they are takes over. You’ve made me realize I need to be more cognizant of the trigger.
    I love the line from The Silence of the Lambs. I need to write that down somewhere.
    Thank you for this, Misha. 🙂

  2. mspetal says:

    Hey Misha,

    The only thing I wanted to say was that the way I have always understood X-Men is as this quote from Wikipedia states: “The X-Men fight for peace and equality between normal humans and mutants in a world where antimutant bigotry is fierce and widespread.” I don’t know much about the movies (only seen one) nor about the original comics, but a friend who IS into the comics says originally the idea behind the story was about anti-bigotry and apparently, one of the arch enemies of the mutants is a fellow mutant who is hell-bent against the X-Men seeking equality with humans. It’s actually more like what they tried to do with the TV show Alphas in the 2nd season.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s