Famous New Wave Short Fiction Writers School

This is a post that I have been thinking about for a while, but a recent comment from The Parasite Guy gave me the nudge I needed to sit down and do it.

I have written a lot about the importance of short fiction and why you should be writing it. Now I want to talk about how to sell it.

I am not going to claim to be some kind of marketing guru (I’m not even offering this course at the low, low, price of 199.99$) but I have noticed a few things about the short fiction market since I started focusing on that instead of novels.

There are basically three places to sell short fiction–magazines, anthologies, and self-publishing (singly or in collections.)

First, Magazines: There are a lot of them, and there is a fair amount of turnover. I’ve listed some on my Dark Corner Newsstand blog (and yes, I know I need to work on updating that…) but if you type [genre] Fiction Magazine into your favorite search engine you’ll find plenty of potential markets.

Now, most fiction writing blogs would cover things like how to write a good hook and what to put in the cover letter, but since you’re reading my blog I’m going to assume that you’re the advanced class and go straight to the big secret, known only to the Elite Masters Of Fiction:

Read the fucking submission guidelines!

Seriously. I see so many rants from magazine editors about getting submissions while they are not accepting submissions, submissions that don’t fit the genre of the magazine, that are outside the word count guidelines, that aren’t formatted they way they want, that contain content they specifically say they don’t accept, and so on.

It’s really not rocket science. Don’t send Romance stories to someone who is looking for Horror.  If the editor says “12 point Courier” then take a moment and format the document that way. If they say put SUBMISSION, [author name], [story title], [word count] as the subject line of the e-mail, then write the subject line that way. If they say to use their submissions widget on their website, don’t send the story as an attachment to the editor’s e-mail. The guidelines should be clear and simple to follow–if they aren’t then maybe you want to give that magazine a miss and go on to the next.

Also, pay attention to estimated turnaround time for submissions. If someone says she or he usually responds within a month, don’t start bugging them for an answer a week after you submit the story. My personal guideline is that if I haven’t heard anything within twice the expected turnaround then I send a  follow up email. If no turnaround time is specified on the magazine’s webpage, then I do a follow up in 90 days. If I don’t get any reply from a follow up (not a “we’re received it and we’re considering it” but no response at all) after two weeks I send a “I’m withdrawing my submission” email and put the story back into my available file.

I strongly recommend sending a “I’m withdrawing” letter if you intend to shop the story elsewhere, by the way. It’s just professional courtesy. Even if they don’t respond to it, you can bask in the warm glow of knowing you have done the right thing.

Anthologies come in two basic flavors–those put together by small presses and those put together by self-published authors. In both cases everything I just said above applies (particularly the Read The Submission Guidelines bit), but there are a few extra things to consider.

Small press anthologies are run more like magazines–in fact, there is a lot of overlap between the two. Millhaven Press, for example, has a regular schedule alternating between magazines and anthologies, with little difference between the two. Superversive Press’ Planetary Series of anthologies, while they have different editors, have a similar format and a regular schedule for publication.

Running an internet search on [genre] calls for submissions will usually uncover a fair number of these.

Self-published anthologies tend to be a lot more fast and loose. There is a certain element of “Hey, we’ve got an old barn and some bedsheets, let put on a show!” (I say this with all due affection, having worked on several). Generally an author will have an idea and put out a call for other authors to contribute. Quality can be all over the board, but someone who is used to putting together novels for publication can put together an anthology, in most cases. Usually in addition to supplying a story contributors will be asked for editorial help, and almost always for marketing help.

Anthologies tend to have a specific theme, sometimes very specific, and before taking the time to write a story tailored for a particular project you should consider whether or not, should the story be rejected by its intended publisher, you can sell it elsewhere. (In most cases the answer will be “yes” if the story is good. I managed to sell my Pizza Horror story after it was turned down by the project I wrote it for, after all.) The big exception to that, of course, is anthologies of stories set in a particular intellectual property owned by the publisher. (I’ve considered putting together an anthology of stories set in the world of The Book Of Lost Doors, if I did so I would specifically allow stories that I did not accept to be published elsewhere, but that might still cut down on contributors options.)

On the other hand, some of the stories originally published in Fauxpocalypse have found homes elsewhere. (Most in author collections, about which more below.)

Self-Publishing Short Fiction is something that I know nothing about, but when have I let that stop me? A number of authors that I know have put together collections of previously published stories, often with a few new stories, and published them on whichever platform they favor. For example, Will There Be Watermelons On Mars? and An Unquiet Calm both contain stories originally published in Fauxpocalypse.

And here is where I’m going to talk about rights reversion. Generally speaking, when you sell a short story what you are selling is first publication rights, and a period of exclusivity during which no one else (including you) can publish the story. That includes publishing on an online forum like a blog, although generally you’d be allowed to put up a short segment of it for promotional purposes.

The period of exclusivity varies from 0 days (you can republish it right away) to up to two years. (I haven’t seen anyone ask for longer than that.) After some soul searching I have decided that I am not going to be selling exclusive publishing rights on a commission basis going forward–if you want exclusive rights to my work I want something upfront. But that’s just me.

The point is that it is important to keep track of publication rights for short fiction. When I sell a story I save a copy of it with an annotation “Originally published in X on Abc, 201x, rights revert on Abc, 201x”. I also keep a subfolder for “Sold” stories and “Sold/Reverted” stories. This way I know what is available to publish again.



About MishaBurnett

I am the author of "Catskinner's Book", a science fiction novel available on Amazon Kindle. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008MPNBNS
This entry was posted in Artists That I Admire, On Promotion, On Writing and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Famous New Wave Short Fiction Writers School

  1. It baffles me that someone would take the time to write a story and then not take the time to read the guidelines before submitting. And yet, I get the impression this is a fairly common occurrence in the writing world. Talk about odd…

    I’m never really sure what to do concerning if/when to bug someone for an answer on something, but your suggested guidelines sound wise and I’m thinking I’ll follow those when I’m tracking submissions. I’ll also be sure to remember withdrawal emails, should things REALLY come to that.

    Thanks for the post! I’m thinking I’ll google for submission calls in the near future and see what I can find.

    • MishaBurnett says:

      Speaking charitably, I think a lot of new authors get so excited about sending work out for publication that they overlook the obvious.

      • Dave Higgins says:

        I’ve also seen occasional fits of arrogance by authors: more than one of the questions I’ve posted on a forum about strategies for getting stories published efficiently has had someone respond with something along the lines of “editors need my stories, but I can always submit somewhere else, so I don’t bother reading the guidelines” or “they’re called guidelines not rules; if your story is good they’ll buy it anyway”.

        Given I won’t be alone in having experienced those threads that probably means editors have mistaken a number of authors who just got excited and slung their story without thinking, for being a bit rude; which, if an editor needs to cull possibles, might be the difference between your next submission being rejected or considered further.

        (Also, cheers for mentioning my collection, Misha)

      • MishaBurnett says:

        Yeah, Dave,that’s the non-charitable explanation.I haven’t seen much advice to writers that involves discussing what are reasonable terms for both parties.

        What I mean is that there seem to be two extreme positions; either “the publisher has all the power and you must accept any terms they offer” of “the author has all the power and can dictate terms to the publisher.”

        Neither is true.It’s a mutual relationship. Both sides need each other, and have to learn to work together. I think that’s going to be my next blog post.

  2. Sound advice – thank you for this!

  3. Stephanie Barr says:

    All good advice.

  4. Pingback: Famous New Wave Short Fiction Writers School, Lesson II | mishaburnett

  5. blehar12 says:

    Great post! There is so much useful information packed in there. This should be mandatory reading for those looking to submit stories.
    On a personal side, I can deal with something off-topic, as long as there is at least a tangential connection to the theme. I’d rather read something and reject it if it doesn’t fit than miss out on a cool story because the author didn’t feel it fit the theme exactly. This is just a personal feeling and probably is not representative of the industry as a whole
    My pet peeve with submissions is not following the e-mail subject line requirement. I usually have several projects going and want the ‘genre/project title’ in the subject line so I don’t have to guess the author’s intention. Is this for the fantasy issue of the magazine, or the western anthology?…I want to know before I open the file.
    A close second is the file format. I get all kinds of crazy formats, fonts, odd-spacing, crazy indents, funky backgrounds, way way outdated word software… For me, the formatting guidelines are there because it removes several steps on my side if a story is accepted. It makes formatting a story from what I get as a submission to what I need it to be for the final product a breeze. There are so many steps from a pile of submissions to a final product that removing a simple, but time consuming one makes a huge difference.

  6. Pingback: Famous New Wave Short Fiction Writers School — mishaburnett – Millhaven Press

  7. I’ve seen a lot of what you talk about in your post since I’m sitting at 20 short stories sold now (and 2 novels). I’ve also just finished editing an anthology for a small press and will confirm that formatting can be all over the map.

    I can top your exclusivity period. One short story came in at 4 years exclusive. There were some extenuating circumstances since it was effectively a master class on editing as well as the normal process of going into an anthology. There were multiple detailed rounds of edits. The nice thing about contracts is you can either negotiate or reject the terms as needed.

  8. Great advice and right now I am at that moment of ‘submit or not submit’ myself. What I often ask though is if the whole work of submitting is worthy for anything else than getting more known since the few e-zines I checked offered around 5 five dollars for a story (when any payment was offered at all). I am not a mercenary but a very busy person, so I ask myself if submitting in such a market is worthy of my time or if I should just publish my stories exclusively on my collection.

  9. And yet another thing I have to ask myself is if most of the short stories would not be better developed as novellas or novels since these can be published as separate books and work up what you have to show as an author better than a single short story collection that a lot of people who would rather read longer work, aren’t into.

    • MishaBurnett says:

      I think that a lot of good short stories are ruined by being turned into mediocre novels. I believe that the market for quality short fiction is there, it’s just been neglected and needs to be revitalized. From what I have seen markets that consistently publish stories written to delight readers rather than impress critics are really starting to take off.

      • That’s at least what I don’t receive as feedback from my readers. They almost unanimously ask me to develop further and expand on most or all of my short stories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.